<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuning Collections in Queries [1]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vsadilovskiy.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/tuning-collections-in-queries-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vsadilovskiy.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/tuning-collections-in-queries-1/</link>
	<description>Findings, solutions and other thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:28:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Venkat</title>
		<link>http://vsadilovskiy.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/tuning-collections-in-queries-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Venkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vsadilovskiy.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/tuning-collections-in-queries-1/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Of the given 2 subject SQL statement, i see that the former(1) is more optimal than (2). (1) has better cardinality than (2).
I did not use any hints.

Your thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the given 2 subject SQL statement, i see that the former(1) is more optimal than (2). (1) has better cardinality than (2).<br />
I did not use any hints.</p>
<p>Your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad Sadilovskiy</title>
		<link>http://vsadilovskiy.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/tuning-collections-in-queries-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad Sadilovskiy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vsadilovskiy.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/tuning-collections-in-queries-1/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Hi Sukumar,

Thanks for the feedback. The credits should also be allowed to Tom Kyte and Jonathan Lewis for the thoughts they had given on asktom.com.

Now I&#039;m in the process of researching and developing framework that would allow this matter be seamlessly used in applications that use collections via Hibernate/EJB3 infrastructure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sukumar,</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback. The credits should also be allowed to Tom Kyte and Jonathan Lewis for the thoughts they had given on asktom.com.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m in the process of researching and developing framework that would allow this matter be seamlessly used in applications that use collections via Hibernate/EJB3 infrastructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sukumar</title>
		<link>http://vsadilovskiy.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/tuning-collections-in-queries-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>sukumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 22:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vsadilovskiy.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/tuning-collections-in-queries-1/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Tried these hints and they worked great. Really appreciate this great article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tried these hints and they worked great. Really appreciate this great article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
